Alignment assignment to ELOs
Type of assignment | ELOs 1 | ELOs 2 | ELOs 3 | ELOs 4 | ELOs 5 | |
Student participation | √ | √ | √ | √ | See formative assessment rubric | |
Individual assignment | √ | |||||
Disscussion | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
Quiz | √ | |||||
Presentation | √ | √ | √ | |||
Paper writing | √ | √ | √ | √ | See sumative assessment rubric |
Formative assessment rubrics
Assessment Criteria | Satisfactory | Good | Very good | Score |
Skor | 61-70 | 71-80 | 81-100 | |
Material Mastery | Mastering some material with limited coverage
|
Mastering all material with limited coverage (only limited to the assigned topic) | Mastering all the material with coverage that is comprehensive across a topic that was assigned (which is still relevant) | |
The accuracy of solving the problem | The solution to the problem is supported by less convincing evidence.
|
Completion of the problem is supported by evidence that is logical and convincing. | The settlement issue is supported by evidence from sources of reference that are reliable and relevant. | |
Communication skills | The speaker delivers a presentation in a calm, flat tone, interacts less with listeners, and is dependent on notes.
|
Speakers delivered presentations with calm and intonation are precise, structured, able to interact with both the listener, maintaining contact with the eyes, but it still depends on the record. | Deliver presentations with full vigor and can transmit enthusiasm to the audience. | |
Ability to face questions | Responding to a questioner with a rather slow question still depends on the book records and/or papers/references were taken, but the answer is right. | Responding to questions with calm and giving answers is right, but it is very confusing and sometimes does not focus. | Responding to questions with confidence. | |
Completeness of props in the presentation | Tool aids have been used but are less supportive material presentation.
|
Tool aids prepared by mature and able to support the presentation of an explanation in the presentation. | Providing and using the tool aids were prepared to mature and make the presentation more interesting and more alive. |
Sumative Assessment rubric
Assessment criteria | Satisfactory | Good | Very good | Score |
Score | 61-70 | 71-80 | 81-100 | |
Topic suitability | The topic paper only represents a portion of the topic discussions are assigned.
|
The topic of the paper is in accordance with the assigned discussion topic | Topics of papers in accordance with the topic of discussion that is assigned developed by creative even interconnected and or integrated with the field of science others | |
Completeness of data | Paper only presents the portion of data that is required. | Complete data and meet the minimum study material needs. | Data is complete and meets the needs of material studies of at least, and added a variety of latest studies. | |
Reference Adequacy | Papers use only part of the recommended references.
|
Papers use only the recommended references. | All recommended references are used and are added with various other reliable references that can present a rich scientific dialectic. | |
Data analysis | Data analysis was only carried out on some of the suggested study materials.
|
Analysis of the data is done on all materials studies are suggested, but only in part of a materials study that examined premises references are reliable. | Analysis of the data is done on all materials studies, which suggested that based on references that reliable. | |
Plagiarism-Free | There are as many as 10-20% portions of the content of papers that indicated plagiarism.
|
A small portion ( less than 10%) of the paper content indicated that it contains plagiarism elements. | All parts of the paper are free from plagiarism elements. | |
Grammar and systematics preparation of reports | The preparation of the paper has been prepared in accordance with the guidelines for writing a paper. However, it has not been neatly and consistently typed, some sentences have not used General Guidelines for Indonesian Spelling (PUEBI), and there are more than 10% the mistyped words. | Preparation of papers has been prepared in accordance with the guidelines for writing papers, typed neatly, and use of General Guidelines for Indonesian Spelling (PUEBI), but the order he wrote still there were less consistent, and there are more than 5%, and less than 10% said the wrong type. | Papers are neat, consistent, typos are less than 5% of the number of words, use General Guidelines for Indonesian Spelling (PUEBI) and the systematic preparation of papers is in accordance with the guidelines for writing papers. |
Examples of coursework assessment rubrics (paper writings and presentations)
Paper Writings
Assessment criteria |
Satisfactory | Good | Very good |
Score | 61-70 | 71-80 | 81-100 |
Topic suitability | The topic paper only represents a portion of the topic discussions are assigned.
|
The topic of the paper is in accordance with the assigned discussion topic | Topics of papers in accordance with the topic of discussion that is assigned developed by creative even interconnected and or integrated with the field of science others |
Completeness of data | Paper only presents the portion of data that is required. | Complete data and meet the minimum study material needs. | Data is complete and meets the needs of material studies of at least, and added a variety of latest studies. |
Reference Adequacy | Papers use only part of the recommended references.
|
Papers use only the recommended references. | All recommended references are used and are added with various other reliable references that can present a rich scientific dialectic. |
Data analysis | Data analysis was only carried out on some of the suggested study materials.
|
Analysis of the data is done on all materials studies are suggested, but only in part of a materials study that examined premises references are reliable. | Analysis of the data is done on all materials studies, which suggested that based on references that reliable. |
Plagiarism-Free | There are as many as 10-20% portions of the content of papers that indicated plagiarism.
|
A small portion ( less than 10%) of the paper content indicated that it contains plagiarism elements. | All parts of the paper are free from plagiarism elements. |
Grammar and systematics preparation of reports | The preparation of the paper has been prepared in accordance with the guidelines for writing a paper. However, it has not been neatly and consistently typed, some sentences have not used General Guidelines for Indonesian Spelling (PUEBI), and there are more than 10% the mistyped words. | Preparation of papers has been prepared in accordance with the guidelines for writing papers, typed neatly, and use of General Guidelines for Indonesian Spelling (PUEBI), but the order he wrote still there were less consistent, and there are more than 5%, and less than 10% said the wrong type. | Papers are neat, consistent, typos are less than 5% of the number of words, use General Guidelines for Indonesian Spelling (PUEBI) and the systematic preparation of papers is in accordance with the guidelines for writing papers. |
Paper Presentation
Assessment Criteria | Satisfactory | Good | Very good |
Skor | 61-70 | 71-80 | 81-100 |
Material Mastery | Mastering some material with limited coverage
|
Mastering all material with limited coverage (only limited to the assigned topic) | Mastering all the material with coverage that is comprehensive across a topic that was assigned (which is still relevant) |
The accuracy of solving the problem | The solution to the problem is supported by less convincing evidence.
|
Completion of the problem is supported by evidence that is logical and convincing. | The settlement issue is supported by evidence from sources of reference that are reliable and relevant. |
Communication skills | The speaker delivers a presentation in a calm, flat tone, interacts less with listeners, and is dependent on notes.
|
Speakers delivered presentations with calm and intonation are precise, structured, able to interact with both the listener, maintaining contact with the eyes, but it still depends on the record. | Deliver presentations with full vigor and can transmit enthusiasm to the audience. |
Ability to face questions | Responding to a questioner with a rather slow question still depends on the book records and/or papers/references were taken, but the answer is right. | Responding to questions with calm and giving answers is right, but it is very confusing and sometimes does not focus. | Responding to questions with confidence. |
Completeness of props in the presentation | Tool aids have been used but are less supportive material presentation.
|
Tool aids prepared by mature and able to support the presentation of an explanation in the presentation. | Providing and using the tool aids were prepared to mature and make the presentation more interesting and more alive. |